Legislature(1995 - 1996)

03/15/1995 03:06 PM House L&C

Audio Topic
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
txt
 HL&C - 03/15/95                                                               
 HB 237 - WORKERS' COMPENSATION AMENDMENTS                                   
                                                                               
 Number 397                                                                    
                                                                               
 CHAIRMAN KOTT announced the next order of business was HB 237.                
                                                                               
 REPRESENTATIVE ELDON MULDER, PRIME SPONSOR OF HB 237, stated that             
 HB 237 was a consensus piece of legislation.  He explained that               
 for seven years they have been trying to come up with a consensus             
 package.  This agreement was reached by members from the Ad Hoc               
 Labor Management Committee on Workers' Compensation Reform.  He               
 stated Alaska was one of the few states, west of the Mississippi,             
 that has been able to realize a reduction in Workers'                         
 Compensation Premiums.  He said that there were six provisions                
 contained within the bill.  Section 2 is the contracted premium               
 rate adjustment, which stipulates that workers' compensation                  
 premium rates cannot be determined by the amount of money you pay             
 your employees.  It's by the amount of risk.  He said that                    
 Section 3 pertains to design professional construction site                   
 liability limits.  This protects professional designers,                      
 engineers and architects who may map out a plan, but through the              
 courts have been held liable through no fault of their own.                   
 Section 4, he stated, contains an element pertaining to                       
 determination of spendable weekly wages.  This is in response to              
 the Gilmore decision which the Supreme Court threw out this                   
 summer.  He stated that the death benefit section is contained in             
 Section 6.  Currently in Alaska statute, for an individual killed             
 on the job, their surviving spouse receives their benefits up to              
 ten years.  However, after five years that benefit is diminished              
 by one-third.  From five to eight years, it is diminished by                  
 half.  This legislation suggests that a more appropriate course               
 would be to extend the benefit through ten years.                             
                                                                               
 Number 469                                                                    
                                                                               
 CHAIRMAN KOTT asked what the rationale was behind that.                       
                                                                               
 REPRESENTATIVE MULDER stated that about the time the surviving                
 spouse is about to get on their feet, presumably by going back to             
 school to make up for the lost income, is about the time you're               
 going to cut back on their benefits and essentially hampering                 
 their efforts.                                                                
                                                                               
 Number 480                                                                    
                                                                               
 CHAIRMAN KOTT added that the cost would be spread out so the cost             
 to employers would be very small.                                             
                                                                               
 REPRESENTATIVE MULDER stated that the net increase to employers               
 would be .006 premium rate adjustment increase.  He also added                
 that there was a very small section of the employee community                 
 that is affected.                                                             
                                                                               
 REPRESENTATIVE ROKEBERG asked why they were revising the law.                 
                                                                               
 REPRESENTATIVE MULDER responded that when you do a workers'                   
 compensation reform package, you seek a balance between the                   
 benefits gained by management versus the benefits gained by                   
 labor, seeking to provide a level playing field so that the net               
 impact to the rate payer will either be neutral or negative.                  
                                                                               
 REPRESENTATIVE MULDER continued that there were two more                      
 provisions.  The Van Bene provision which provides immunity for               
 insurance companies that provide workplace safety inspection                  
 programs.  He said that the final element, contained in Section               
 8, is fraud.  Currently, if an employer believes an employee is               
 guilty of fraud, their only recourse is to take it to court.                  
 This would allow the employer to go before the board, which is                
 far simpler and less expensive.                                               
                                                                               
 Number 531                                                                    
                                                                               
 REPRESENTATIVE KUBINA asked if the department endorses the bill.              
                                                                               
 CHAIRMAN KOTT stated that the department did endorse the bill as              
 written.                                                                      
                                                                               
 Number 538                                                                    
                                                                               
 DARIO NOTTI, LEGISLATIVE INTERN TO SENATOR DUNCAN, explained he               
 was testifying on his own behalf, and asked if the employee had               
 the right to appeal to the courts in a fraud case.                            
                                                                               
 REPRESENTATIVE MULDER responded they did.                                     
                                                                               
 Number 554                                                                    
                                                                               
 MARIANNE BURKE, DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF INSURANCE, DEPARTMENT OF                
 COMMERCE AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, testified that the Division                
 supports the legislation.  However, Section 2 has potential                   
 impact on overall premiums.  Any additional administrative costs              
 that might be incurred would have to be shared by all of the                  
 insured.  She continued that if credits were received by a                    
 portion of the group, based on an average salary and credit                   
 scale, the difference in premiums will have to be made up by the              
 remaining group members.                                                      
                                                                               
 Number 567                                                                    
                                                                               
 REPRESENTATIVE PORTER asked for a factual example of this.                    
                                                                               
 MS. BURKE stated, that workers' compensation premiums start out               
 with a manual rate.  Depending on different factors, you may pay              
 more than or less than that rate based on a percentage.  If you               
 had a good record with very few claims, you would pay a smaller               
 percentage of the manual rates.  If you had many claims, you                  
 would pay a higher percentage of manual rates.  She stated the                
 method currently structured is an open ended payroll base.  The               
 starting point for developing this premium is your total payroll.             
 If an employer has a $10 million payroll, but you limit that                  
 payroll to the average weekly salary, the total amount of money               
 needed to pay all claims remains the same so you must collect                 
 premiums from the remaining participants.                                     
                                                                               
 Number 598                                                                    
                                                                               
 WILLY VAN HEMERT, CIVIL ENGINEER, MEMBER, AD HOC LABOR MANAGEMENT             
 COMMITTEE ON WORKERS' COMPENSATION REFORM, testified via                      
 teleconference that the Ad Hoc Committee was a voluntary                      
 consensus group of both labor and management.  He stated that                 
 they had attempted to eliminate third party providers, such as                
 insurance and medical providers.  He pointed out that the                     
 committee is structured through organized labor and the                       
 management side is composed of members of Workers' Compensation               
 Committee of Alaska (WCCA).  He concluded by saying that this was             
 a consensus bill that comes as a package.                                     
                                                                               
 TAPE 95-18, SIDE A                                                            
 Number 000                                                                    
                                                                               
 MR. VAN HEMERT stated that not all costs related to workers'                  
 compensation benefits are directly proportionate to wages, namely             
 medical benefits.  He said that if someone breaks their arm, the              
 benefit cost for that arm is the same.  It doesn't matter if they             
 are making $10 an hour or $25 an hour.  In some cases, there is a             
 limit on the salary cap on benefits.  He said as far as rate                  
 making is concerned, the state of Alaska uses NCCI as their rate              
 maker.                                                                        
                                                                               
 Number 027                                                                    
                                                                               
 CHAIRMAN KOTT asked what Mr. Van Hemert's role was in putting the             
 package together.                                                             
                                                                               
 MR. VAN HEMERT responded that he was a representative for WCCA,               
 and the co-chairperson to the Ad Hoc Committee.                               
                                                                               
 Number 042                                                                    
                                                                               
 CHAIRMAN KOTT stated that this proposal seemed more expansive                 
 than the original proposal that the Ad Hoc Committee had been                 
 working on.                                                                   
                                                                               
 MR. VAN HEMERT responded that there were a couple of things the               
 drafters of the bill changed.                                                 
                                                                               
 Number 068                                                                    
                                                                               
 KEVIN DOUGHERTY, General Council for Alaska Laborers, Co-Chair,               
 Ad Hoc Labor Management Committee on Workers' Compensation                    
 Reform, testified via teleconference in support of HB 237.                    
                                                                               
 Number 109                                                                    
 CHAIRMAN KOTT closed public testimony.                                        
                                                                               
 REPRESENTATIVE PORTER made a motion to move HB 237 from committee             
 with individual recommendations, and zero fiscal notes.                       
                                                                               
 CHAIRMAN KOTT asked if there was an objection.  Hearing none, HB
 237 was moved out of the House Labor and Commerce Committee.                  

Document Name Date/Time Subjects